Editorial Standards

1. Who publishes this blog

TaskCoach.AI publishes these articles and sells the TaskCoach product. We have a commercial interest when we recommend it. Our comparisons should explain that relationship, the job each tool serves, and situations where another option may fit better.

A recommendation is an editorial judgment, not a guarantee that an app will work for every reader. A broad feature list is not evidence of better results.

2. Authors and AI assistance

David, the co-founder of TaskCoach.AI, writes selected articles under his own byline. Other bylines identify TaskCoach AI coach personas. These are branded editorial voices, not human specialists. Author profiles disclose that distinction.

AI tools can assist research, drafting and editing. TaskCoach remains accountable for the published material. We do not invent human identities, qualifications, expert reviews or personal experiences to make an article appear more authoritative.

3. Sources and evidence

Our standard is to support factual claims with traceable sources and distinguish published findings from our interpretation. References appear in the article itself, including the version available without JavaScript. A reference supports the relevant claim; its presence does not validate every statement on the page.

Product pages and help centers establish what a vendor says its product offers. They do not establish independent effectiveness. Research results should retain their population, setting and limitations. We do not invent statistics, quotations, citations or customer outcomes.

4. How to read product comparisons

An article should say whether it draws on official documentation, publisher screenshots, TaskCoach demo screens or a described hands-on test. Suggested scenarios and fictional examples are illustrations. They are not customer results or evidence that every product was tested.

Check the source and verification date beside changing product claims. Prices, free allowances and device support can differ by country, platform and account. Before paying, verify the current plan, renewal and cancellation terms with the provider.

Our comparison worksheets help readers record their own experience with one real task. A short trial can reveal friction or fit; it does not prove long-term behavior change. Paid placements or affiliate relationships should be disclosed where they affect a recommendation.

5. Publication dates and updates

Publication and update dates describe the article, not the date the website was rebuilt. Material content changes receive a new update date. A template, formatting or deployment change alone does not make the underlying research newly verified.

We correct the existing article when a source, product detail or explanation needs to change. Source-check dates inside comparisons identify the scope of a check; they are not a promise that all linked pages remain unchanged.

6. Limits of the content

The blog provides educational material and practical planning ideas. It does not provide individualized medical, mental-health, legal or financial advice. Apps and AI conversations do not replace qualified professional care.

TaskCoach focuses on goals, habits, planning and executive-function support. Claims about treatment, diagnosis or clinical outcomes require appropriate evidence and qualified review. An AI persona is not that reviewer.

7. Corrections and contact

To report an error, send the article URL, the specific claim and any supporting source to [email protected]. We aim to respond within five business days and correct verified errors in the article.